There's something almost comical about the journey I've taken to arrive at what I'm about to share with you. Hundreds of books, dozens of intensive trainings, conversations with experts whose wisdom I deeply respect—all to discover something that, once seen, feels almost absurdly simple.
But that's how the mind works. When faced with suffering, it immediately wants to solve, to fix, to deploy the right strategy. We want healing to be complex because complexity is what our analytical minds know how to work with. The left hemisphere specializes in breaking things down, categorizing, finding the right tool for the job.
Except that's not how healing works.
At the heart of every movement of healing lies this truth: when that which suffers receives loving attunement, healing naturally follows. It's a fundamental pattern that emerges consistently across contexts and approaches. The movement toward wholeness depends on just two essential ingredients: sufficient safety for what's been fragmented or disowned to emerge into awareness, and contact with the quality of loving presence that is, in fact, our fundamental nature. When these two elements come together, transformation isn't something we do—it's something that happens through us, as naturally as a river finding its way to the sea or a flower opening to the sun.
The Genesis of Suffering
To understand healing, we must first understand how suffering arises. At its most fundamental level, suffering emerges from a failure of love—or perhaps more precisely, a failure of attunement. Suffering occurs when some movement of reality fails to receive the loving attunement it requires to be integrated with the whole.
This is a lived reality we can observe everywhere. A child's tantrum represents their attempt to receive attunement for an emotional state that feels overwhelming. Addiction masks a desperate attempt to soothe parts of ourselves that never received adequate care. Even physical symptoms can reflect aspects of our being crying out for the attention and love they've been denied.
When aspects of our experience fail to receive loving attunement—when we reject, judge, or turn away from parts of ourselves—these aspects don't simply disappear. They become fragmented, split off from our conscious awareness but continuing to influence our lives from the shadows. The suffering persists because the fundamental need for attuned love remains unmet.
How We Become Fragmented
From our earliest moments, we learn which aspects of our experience are welcome in our environment and which are not. When certain feelings, needs, or expressions are met with consistent rejection, criticism, or simply the absence of attunement, we develop ingenious strategies to protect ourselves. We learn to hide these unwelcome parts—from others and eventually from ourselves.
This fragmentation isn't pathological; it's a brilliant adaptive strategy. A child who learns that anger leads to abandonment doesn't choose to disconnect from their anger out of weakness—they do so out of wisdom, self-preservation, and the helpless longing for love. The parts of ourselves we've disowned or fragmented aren't problems to be fixed; they're aspects of our experience that never received the attuned love they needed to integrate naturally into our whole being.
Over time, these adaptive strategies become increasingly automatic and unconscious. We develop elaborate internal architectures designed to keep certain experiences at a safe distance. We might intellectualize our emotions, dissociate from bodily sensations, project our disowned qualities onto others, or numb ourselves through various means. These strategies allow us to function, but at a cost—disconnection from the depth of our experience and the wisdom it contains.
The Essential Movements of Healing
The First Movement: Creating Safety
The journey back to wholeness begins with safety. Without sufficient safety, fragmented aspects of ourselves simply won't risk emerging into awareness. This makes perfect sense; these parts developed protective strategies precisely because the environment wasn't safe for their expression. Why would they abandon these protections unless they genuinely sense it may now be safe to do so?
But what is safety, exactly? One way of seeing it is that safety is the felt sense of being welcomed just as we are—that it's OK to be us, exactly as we are. This is crucial to understand: we can be safe and anxious, safe and scared, safe and in profound emotional pain. Safety isn't the absence of difficult feelings but the presence of fundamental welcome for whatever we're experiencing.
Safety operates on multiple dimensions simultaneously. There's somatic safety—the nervous system's capacity to relax and be present. Emotional safety—the ability to feel feelings without drowning or numbing. Relational safety—being seen and touched without collapse or armor. And existential safety—trusting the fundamental nature of reality itself. These dimensions can develop independently and support each other in complex ways. As we heal in any dimension, it often creates space for healing in others, until we discover that safety isn't something we achieve but something we recognize was always already here—our original belonging to life itself.
The Sacred Act of Confession
A marker of when we are in a safe context is when we feel secure enough to express how unsafe we feel. This is a crucial threshold of authentic safety.
Consider how often we navigate environments where we must maintain the appearance of being "fine"—workplaces, social gatherings, even family dynamics where vulnerability is unwelcome. In these contexts, we're not only feeling unsafe in some particular way; we're doubly unsafe because we cannot even acknowledge this lack of safety. We must pretend, perform, hide—maintaining the façade that everything is okay when it clearly isn't.
A genuinely safe space reveals itself when we can finally drop the pretense and give voice to exactly how unsafe, unworthy, afraid, or broken we might feel. The ability to say "I don't feel safe here" or "I'm terrified right now" or "I don't trust this process"—this is the hallmark of safety.
This movement bears a striking resemblance to the practice of confession found in many spiritual traditions. In Catholic confession, a person speaks their hidden shame, their failures, their suffering to a priest who represents divine holding and love. In Buddhist monasteries, monks gather monthly to confess where they've deviated from their code of conduct. These aren't arbitrary rituals—they reflect a profound understanding of the healing power of speaking what has been hidden.
I think of a client who, after many sessions of building trust together, finally felt safe enough to reveal something he'd carried for decades: a deep well of shame about having "wasted his life." From the outside, his life looked enviable—financial success, a loving marriage, a beautiful home. But underneath, he felt he had betrayed his deeper truth, settling for security rather than following his authentic path. When he finally risked confessing this shame, bringing it fully into the space between us, something profound shifted. Together, we could meet this pain with loving attunement—without judgment, without any need for it to change or go away—and it opened into a deep recognition of grace, self-forgiveness, and a renewed sense of possibility.
The act of confession—of speaking what we're afraid to speak, feeling what we're afraid to feel—is itself a movement toward integration. When we bring our suffering into relationship—when we say it, embody it, allow it to be seen and heard—it's already beginning to transform.
The Second Movement: Loving Attunement
When safety is present and something previously fragmented or hidden emerges into conscious awareness, we arrive at the second essential movement: loving attunement.
Throughout the ages, mystics and contemplatives have pointed to a fundamental truth: love is the essential nature of being itself. When this love makes contact with suffering—when there is intimacy between our fundamental nature and what hurts—healing happens.
Different teachers have described this reality in their own ways. Daniel P. Brown identified the essential qualities of secure attachment. A.H. Almas speaks of the variegated qualities of presence—strength, compassion, will, joy, etc—each a different facet of our essential nature. Other traditions simply call it love, or awareness, or the ground of being. But all are pointing to the same recognition: our essential identity, underneath all our parts and pain, is loving presence.
When the loving presence that we essentially are comes into intimate contact with suffering, transformation happens naturally. This occurs through what we might call attunement—the capacity to feel deeply into what is present and respond with exquisite appropriateness to what is needed.
In my coaching practice I witness this pattern repeatedly: when we can open to hidden suffering and feel the the precise lack at its heart, loving presence responds with precisely what was missing—and it does so in a way that feels like grace. The exact quality of holding, reassurance, patience, protection, or understanding that was absent in the sufferings genesis begins to flow. This doesn't happen because we're trying to manufacture the right response, but because genuine need has an inherent capacity to call forth the appropriate response when met with attuned presence. The wound recognizes what it has always been seeking and naturally begins to soften and integrate.
This isn't about cultivating separate qualities or learning techniques. It's about recognizing that love already knows how to respond when it encounters suffering. When we stop interfering with this natural movement—when we cease trying to fix, manage, or improve what we find—our essential nature reveals its inherent wisdom.
I remember my own experience during a period of intense breakdown when I had aspects of my psyche emerging that I simply couldn't figure out how to be with. I tried everything—meditation, self-inquiry, processing with friends—but nothing worked. It wasn't until I met someone who had walked through the same depths of suffering and could therefore actually attune to what I was experiencing with complete loving awareness, without any desire for it to go away, with absolute trust (which neither I nor my well-meaning friends could seem to bring), that these parts finally found what they were looking for and began to melt.
What's remarkable is that this capacity doesn't require special training or techniques (though these can certainly help). It's already present in and as our fundamental nature. We might say that healing is simply the process of removing the obstacles that prevent love from flowing freely towards suffering.
When these two movements—safety and loving attunement—come together, integration occurs as naturally as water finding its way downhill. There's an innate intelligence in our being that knows exactly how to heal when the conditions are right. Sometimes this happens dramatically, sometimes subtly, but the movement is always toward greater wholeness.
The Clarification of Identity
As we offer loving presence to our fragmented parts, our understanding of who we are begins to shift. We gradually realize that we are not primarily the collection of parts, patterns, feelings, and stories we've identified with, but the awareness that can hold all of these with loving presence.
Over time this becomes a lived recognition, one that emerges naturally through the practice of bringing presence into relationship with suffering. As we repeatedly experience ourselves as the loving awareness that can meet everything with acceptance, we begin to identify more deeply with this secure base rather than with the contents of our experience.
This recognition points to one way of seeing the difference between awakening and liberation. Awakening is the recognition of our fundamental nature as loving awareness—a realization that can happen in an instant. Liberation, however, is the slow, patient work of bringing that loving awareness into attuned right relationship with all the cast-off parts of our interior. It's the gradual refactoring of our entire psyche to align with our fundamental nature.
This distinction helps us understand one form that spiritual bypassing can take—it's essentially the recognition of our essential nature without doing the work of integrating that insight into our unique psychological structure. Someone might have genuine insight about their true nature as awareness while still being unwilling or unable to offer that awareness to their shame, their rage, their terror, or their grief. True liberation requires that we bring loving attunement to every hidden room in our psyche, every disowned aspect of our experience.
Our ultimate commitment, as Mahayana Buddhism reminds us, must be to the liberation of all beings—which at the very least includes all the fragmented parts of ourselves that are still waiting to be welcomed home.
The Embarrassing Simplicity: From Complexity Back to Essence
I must confess something that feels almost embarrassing after years of intensive training, studying countless modalities, living in a monastery, and devoting an unreasonable amount of time to understanding human transformation: it really is this simple. The essential movement of healing—creating safety for what's been fragmented to emerge, and meeting it with the qualities of secure attachment—is the essence of every approach to transformation I've encountered.
This simplicity feels almost scandalous in a world where complexity is often equated with sophistication and value. The transformational world has developed hundreds of approaches with different terminology, techniques, and theoretical frameworks, each claiming distinctive value and unique efficacy - like a transformational Tower of Babel, where practitioners can struggle to communicate across modalities despite working with the same fundamental human realities. This diversification isn't entirely misguided; different approaches do resonate with different individuals and address different aspects of human experience. But beneath this diversity lies a remarkably consistent pattern: suffering integrates through secure, attuned presence.
What German philosopher G.W.F. Hegel called "the second simplicity"—the clarity that emerges on the other side of complexity—is urgently needed in this field. This doesn't mean abandoning the rich diversity of approaches that have developed; it's about recognizing their common essence and developing shared language that can transcend specific modalities.
The Path Forward
Healing isn't rocket science. In fact, it’s is our birthright—a fundamental human capacity that has only recently been compartmentalized into the therapeutic and self-help industries where we're taught to appeal to experts for what is actually as natural to us as breathing and digestion. While there are certainly movements of the psyche that require expert support to unfold safely, much healing becomes possible simply by creating spaces where ordinary people can relate to each other from presence and where it’s safe to confess their suffering.
The idea that we need specialized experts to heal isn't entirely true. What we need are communities and cultures where attuned loving presence is the foundation of how we relate to one another.
I currently get paid to offer attuned presence to people’s suffering. This is strange. The only reason this is even a profession is because our culture has become so broken. Before the rise of empire and our global intimacy disorder, attuned loving presence was simply the bedrock of human culture.1 That is how it should be, and if we want to navigate the meta-crisis facing our world, that is how it must become again.
For now, I'll continue to sell water by the riverside while also engaging in the kind of cultural change work that aims for a future where my "profession" becomes wholly unnecessary. Because the ultimate goal isn't to perfect transformational technique—it's to restore the conditions where healing happens naturally through the ordinary grace of human connection in healthy culture.
In upcoming pieces, I'll explore these two essential movements in greater depth—first examining what true safety actually looks like and how we can cultivate it both for ourselves and others, then diving into the practice of loving attunement and how we can develop this capacity in relationship with all aspects of our experience. Both deserve the careful attention that can only come from dedicated exploration of their practical dimensions.
Philosophical foundations: This piece draws upon several wisdom traditions explored in my Lineages of Inspiration article, which outlines the key influences shaping my understanding of human transformation.
Work with me: I offer one-on-one guidance helping people develop secure attachment with reality through deep unfoldment work. If this resonates, explore working together.
See Preconquest Conciousness by E. Richard Sorenson
Endless bangers... whatever creative veins you're tapping into, keep going 💥
So much insight here, Daniel! I feel you really touching into the root of the matter. I so appreciate your asking us to grapple with the intersection of capitalism and healing...Pointing out that a healer working in true integrity will aim to "be put out of their job." I've been wondering if healing is something our bodies know how to do, but that our culture just needs to reminded. Resonating w your proposal that it would be helpful to find more common (root) language across modalities. I love your framing of the difference bt awakening and liberation. Thank you for collecting and synthesizing many of the inquiries I've had on the subject)